2,458 users, 3 online now.
A total of 636,162 plays!

Index » Titanic! » Feature Requests » kudosu management improve

2 posts | Jump | 1
wilted_rose
240 posts
RU Flag

5 days ago
since titanic got guest difficulty support, there has been new inconsistency encountered - it's still possible to get only one kudosu per mod, even if this is multiple diffuculties mod that were constructive and helpful.
my thought is next: increase maximum kudosu count to set participants count so if modder will post multiple mod with one post, participants which guest difficulties were modded could give kudosu for fair and helpful mod. also for easier kudosu management from higher privileged staff (like NAT on bancho (or actually moderator with bn privilegies in titanic)) it might be helpful to implement website panel that will allow moderator to remove kudosu if it was given by, for example, missclick from set gder side, but im honestly don't know if something like this exists - i can judge only by something i have seen (that was kudosu penalty in -1 kudosu face for specific player due to global kudosu removal by moderator)
Jason X
10 posts
LU Flag

3 days ago

wilted_rose wrote:

it might be helpful to implement website panel that will allow moderator to remove kudosu if it was given

This was a thing back in modding v1. I experienced this myself quite some times and I got kudosu for posts that were not worth giving kudos for (metadata or timing posts).
In most cases I had to alert a QAT member to get the kudosu removed.

As for the panel, it should be a thing, just not as a panel, but as a button instead.
Looked like this on modding v1 in forum: Thank pishifat for the images :)
Example screenshots

On a post without kudosu:


On a post with kudosu:


Once removed:


Post with denied kudosu:


Kudosu history (screenshot taken by me)


As of now, kudosu has no use, but even then, it should be regulated so that no one individual can get kudosu for a meaningless post that contributes nothing.
For that, I also propose that we set clear boundaries for what should be awarded and what shouldn't.
I suppose this discussion on bancho (url) would be a good place to start.

Also, it shouldn't be moderators being responsible for denying kudosu, but rather the BAT, as they're more proficient in mapping (in most cases) and therefore can better judge whether a post is worth receiving kudosu or not. Sure, moderators could also get the option to use the button, same with admins, but still, better to trust those with experience in the field.

Well, here are my 5 cents, do with it as you please (=w=)

2 posts | Jump | 1