Index » Beatmaps » Ranked/Approved Beatmaps » Larval Stage Planning - Trip -innocent of D- (TV Size)

• arutama's Normal (2.14 stars, 195 notes)
  
• Insane (4.36 stars, 284 notes)
  
• pimpG's Hard (3.7 stars, 222 notes)
  
• vg185's Easy (1.41 stars, 79 notes)
  

iSlodinx wrote:

Hello, i'm gonna be your first nominator for this set.

General:
- I think adding kiai would be nice in all diffs to be honest. O, Added

Insane:
- 00:16:521 (2) - this circle is a bit far, maybe move it to x:248 y:64 and then move 00:17:253 (1) - to x:232 y:60, then move 00:17:436 (2,1) - to x:432 y:192 [X, I think its fine, reduced spacing on 00:17:253 (1)]
- 00:39:387 (2) - maybe move this circle to x:320 y:128 [O, Nerfed a little bit]
- 01:22:375 (2) - maybe move this circle to x:248 y:288 [X, imo since this is the end of the song might as well spaced it out more and its hittable on DT anyway]

iSlodinx wrote:

Hello, i'm gonna be your first nominator for this set.

General:
- I think adding kiai would be nice in all diffs to be honest.

vg185's Easy:
- 00:28:045 (6) - i think this slider end should end in 00:29:143 in my opinion

ten10's Hard:

00:03:167 (1) - remove NC

00:03:533 (2) - NC

00:06:643 (3) - Object's end is slightly unsnapped! Off by -2ms.

00:59:143 (3) - Object's end is slightly unsnapped! Off by -2ms.

01:01:704 (1) - Object's end is slightly unsnapped! Off by -2ms.

01:22:741 (1) - remove NC

01:23:106 (1) - remove NC

Insane:
- 00:16:521 (2) - this circle is a bit far, maybe move it to x:248 y:64 and then move 00:17:253 (1) - to x:232 y:60, then move 00:17:436 (2,1) - to x:432 y:192
- 00:39:387 (2) - maybe move this circle to x:320 y:128
- 01:22:375 (2) - maybe move this circle to x:248 y:288

Satori wrote:

mod moment

General:
- all difficulties need lead-in time of 1300ms (besides easy which needs 900ms) [O, Added all diffs]
- remove zai bg [?, no zai bg in the map, unless you're talking to remove ten10 diff then no]
- maybe make vg185 bg lower resolution [X, its fine its only 1 pixel off]

Insane:
- 00:12:862 (4,3) - assuming these were supposed to overlap perfectly (again), so maybe fix [O, fixed in 2015 client]
- 00:16:887 (3) - this should go somewhere further away from 00:16:521 (2) - on the playfield, a player will definitely hit this too early, either that, or stack it so it's between 00:16:521 (2) - and 00:17:253 (1) [O, okayge]
- 01:22:740 (3) - ^[O, applied]
- 00:34:082 (1,1,1,1) - why NC all these? it feels unecessary and it may give the played the wrong message [O, removed the NCs]

that's all i think

iSlodinx wrote:

Hey uh kudosu please, same goes for Satori.

Satori wrote:

Normal:
- 00:24:387 (2) - maybe move this to 00:24:204 - i think it works a little better, but up to you

> X | i intentionally put it there to emphasize both vocal and drum at the same time, will keep it

• "vg185.jpg" exceeds 2560px, could try using this instead.

• 00:03:167 (9,1) - What about starting the NC from (9) along the downbeat?

• 00:28:960 (2,4) - Subjective suggestion, but what about doing ctrl+G? Overall flow were circular and then suddenly this one felt a bit off from the concept. Sure it gave an effective contrast towards the next section, but somehow swapping objects fits better with the style imo.
  
• 00:34:631 (1,1) - 00:36:460 (6,1) - This jump is definitely doable, but from the perspective of balance, don't you think these are very gigantic? Even kiai doesn't feature such scaled jumps. Wouldn't the amount as much as 00:37:923 (4,1) - be enough?

Sonnyc wrote:

General:

• "vg185.jpg" exceeds 2560px, could try using this instead.
  [> O, very nice i upscaled the original image because its too low quality and hope that a pixel off would let it slide…]

Insane:

• 00:28:960 (2,4) - Subjective suggestion, but what about doing ctrl+G? Overall flow were circular and then suddenly this one felt a bit off from the concept. Sure it gave an effective contrast towards the next section, but somehow swapping objects fits better with the style imo.
  [> O, yeah that actually flows well enough]
  
• 00:34:631 (1,1) - 00:36:460 (6,1) - This jump is definitely doable, but from the perspective of balance, don't you think these are very gigantic? Even kiai doesn't feature such scaled jumps. Wouldn't the amount as much as 00:37:923 (4,1) - be enough?
  [> O, now that i've looked into it many times now i realized that the spacing might be too big so I nerfed the spacing hopefully that plays well enough]

iSlodinx wrote:

ten10 used AI-generated tool on his difficulty, i suggest you to remove it and find someone who can make hard diff, or you can make it yourself!